Nowadays,
you can read and listen on boundary disputes, dozen of them every
day. And they are mostly among small countries, like a territorial
dispute between Croatia and Slovenia or between Croatia and Bosnia
& Herzegovina. However, a quick history browsing reveals that
boundary dis- putes are not a privilege of small countries.
The
Alaska boundary dispute was a territorial dispute between the United
States and Canada (then a British Dominion with its foreign affairs
controlled from London). It was resolved by arbi- tration in 1903.
The dispute had been going on between the Russian and British
Empires since 1821, and was inherited by the United States as a
consequence of the Alaska Purchase in 1867. The final resolution
favored the American position, and Canada did not get an all-Canada
outlet from the Yukon gold fields to the sea. The disappointment and
anger in Canada was directed less at the United States, and more at
the British government for betraying Canadian interests in pursuit
of a friendly relationship between Britain and the United States.
An
access to the sea, that is also in the essence of Croatian
territorial dispute with Slovenia and Bosnia & Herzegovina. So,
national pride aside, how important it is to be a maritime country?