The
age of the most biblical characters seems ridiculous - several
hundred years. So, an obvious thought, we wrongly assumed that the
time unit mentioned in the scriptures is a year, it is something
shorter. There were attempts to assign a month to the unit but
that would mean some of those characters fathered children in
their childhood. Besides, that was my thought many years ago, moon
phases didn’t mean much in the early agricultural societies in
Mesopotamia and Egypt. It is Sun, the major holiness in so many
religions, to whom a farmer owns so much. And we know that
equinox, vernal and autumnal, and solstice, summer and winter,
were among the first human astronomical knowledge. If we assume
the time unit mentioned in the scriptures to be a season, that is
one quarter of a year, than biblical ages of a hundred to two
hundred years are acceptable. Even today an age of hundred years
is not rare; in the biblical times environment was healthier, man
was more dependent on nature than on his own culture, and the
accumulation of genetic errors in Homo Sapiens was lower. I did
mention my hypothesis to some of my friends with no much approval.
Recently,
while reading on the subject of agriculture origins, I’ve ran
into the same dilemma. Historians place the beginning of
agriculture in Mesopotamia roughly ten thousand years ago, which
coincides with the end of last glacial period, 12,500 years ago.
Of course, this is the beginning of agriculture as main food
source - farming as supple- mental food source dates probably
thousands years earlier. But in my high school textbook, in early
nineteen-fifties, I remember, I was astonished reading that
Egyptian ruling dynasties could be traced, by their stone
inscriptions, 36 thousand years ago. Here we go again: taking
those "years" as seasons, nine thousand years fit nicely
into the picture because large scale agriculture was the very base
of city and state as social institutions.